Good
afternoon, Friends. I'm sorry that it has been so long since my last
post. As you probably gathered I've been going through a bit of a
rough time. I'm doing my best to claw my way out of it and as such my
focus has mostly been on writing. It's been good for me, but it's
well past time for me to post something. So here I am.
Last
Friday after I got back home from what was a very exciting, albeit
long, day I didn't want to do anything except have a glass of wine
and watch some TV. I knew I had an episode of How I Met Your Mother
to catch up on, so I settled in to watch what I had been told was a
really funny episode.
:Spoilers
Below:
Now,
I love HIMYM. I think it's a great show and it's even got a couple of
my favorite actors on it. I really enjoyed the episode “P.S. I love
you”, which was all about how it is possible for anyone to get a
little crazy and obsessive.
However,
as the episode finished I found myself feeling uncharacteristically
disturbed. I try hard not to take things I see on television too
terribly seriously. I'm always annoyed by those people who want to
take apart every show/video game/movie, whatever, and talk about why
it is awful and evil. That said, I found that I couldn't just dismiss
this episode as light-hearted and funny.
Why
am I disturbed by a show that I love, you might ask? In a word:
stalking. In this particular episode Ted talks about what he calls
“Dobler vs. Dahmer”, the idea that if a person's actions are
either sweet or creepy depends completely on the person on the
receiving end of it. For example, in the episode there is a girl on
the subway who is reading the same book as Ted. He begins to try and
track her down, only to be stopped by his friends. Much to his
surprise, the girl tracks him down to his work. Over the course of
the episode it is revealed that the girl has gone to alarming lengths
to arrange for the two of them to meet. There are other plotlines
involving stalking as well and it is all framed within this “Dobler
vs. Dahmer” idea.
Now,
I get what they are going for and, as I said, the episode was really
funny. But...even though I laughed and did enjoy it, it also kind of
raised the hairs on the back of my neck.
Why?
Well, not to be alarmist, but I think that playing stalking for
laughs is dangerous in a rape culture where more and more people are
being taught not to respect that “no means no”. Instead, someone
refusing to take “no” for an answer is something that we are
supposed to be complimented by.
It is supposed to be a sign of the depth of their feelings. Of their
passion.
Am
I being crazy? I don't think so. You can't swing a paperback without
hitting some reference to 50 Shades of Grey, which has replaced the
Twilight books as the swoon-over-the-hearthrob-male-lead book. Well,
let's look at the male leads in those books. They both stalk their
respective would-be partners. In Twilight Edward stalks Bella
obsessively (and she returns the favor). He breaks into her house
and watches her sleep. He uses
the minds of her classmates to keep tabs on her. He uses a new car to
bribe Alice to keep Bella effectively prisoner while he is gone. In
the first book when Bella finds out that he followed her to Port
Angeles what is her response?
“I
wondered if it should bother me that he was following me; instead I
felt a strange surge of pleasure.”
(Italics mine)
Or
perhaps from 50 Shades:
“'How
did you find me?'
'I tracked your cell phone Anastasia.'
Oh, of course he did. How is that possible? Is it legal? Stalker, my subconscious whispers at me through the cloud of tequila that’s still floating in my brain, but somehow, because it’s him, I don’t mind.” (Bold mine)
'I tracked your cell phone Anastasia.'
Oh, of course he did. How is that possible? Is it legal? Stalker, my subconscious whispers at me through the cloud of tequila that’s still floating in my brain, but somehow, because it’s him, I don’t mind.” (Bold mine)
Edward
and Christian are supposed to be the perfect men. They are the men
who we, the audience, are supposed to root for the female lead (our
proxy in the story) to get together with. We are supposed to excuse
their behavior because they are just so dreamy and damn it we should
be flattered
that
such a paragon of manhood would want to take the time and make the
effort to hunt us down. Because that's what it is. It's hunting.
It's what predators do. And every day there are dozens of people who
find themselves subjected to that kind of attention. And what's
really scary is that culturally we are being taught that flattered
is
the response that we should have. We should take it as a compliment.
Also alarming is that to go along with this charming environment of
predation there is a massive tendency towards victim blaming. It is
the stalkee's fault that they are being pursued. They must have done
something to ask for it.
*Shudders*
Stalking
isn't romantic. It is terrifying. Love, real love and relationships
are about mutual trust and respect. If you stalk someone you are
imposing your desires upon them. It is inherently selfish. It is
about fulfilling the stalker's needs. It is not loving or respectful.
I guess the
big question that this episode brought up to me really is tied to
this idea that if the person being stalked is it ok with it, are the
stalker's actions still wrong?
I look at
the examples from popular literature that I have already cited and
they make me cringe. I certainly find Edward and Christian's actions
reprehensible. If they were my friends I would still take them to
task for it, regardless of how their targets felt about it. If
Christian were my son he would be in a world of trouble for stalking
someone. So, even though I know that their respective partners
appreciate that type of attention, I still can't get behind the idea
that it is ok.
If
one of my friends were being stalked I would be terrified
for
them, even if they were flattered by the attention. I would try to
talk them out of being flattered by it, not because I am a meddler,
but because I wouldn't want anything to happen to them. Stalking
isn't a sign of affection. It is a bid for control that is ultimately
rooted in selfish desires. And it rarely ends well. For those
reasons, I know that my answer to the question that titles this post
is a resounding "HELL NO".
I don't
know. I'm not trying to preach. I don't have any answers. I am just
deeply alarmed at this trend towards normalizing stalking and abuse.
I think
this is a good place to stop and collect my thoughts. It's totally
possible that I will write some more on this at a later date...I just
wanted to get some of these thoughts on paper. Feel free to weigh in
in the comments if there's anything you'd like me to address. Like I
said, I don't have all the answers and I'm not trying to preach-I
just wanted to share some of my thoughts/feelings on the subject.
No comments:
Post a Comment